Re: pipe broken by WSL?

[Thomas Wolff <towo at towo dot net>]

Am 02.05.2019 um 18:26 schrieb Eliot Moss:
> On 5/2/2019 11:37 AM, Stephen Carrier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> > > Calling WSL seems to break pipe processing:
> > >
> > > (echo 1; echo 2) |
> > > while read line
> > > do
> > >    echo $line
> > >    wsl uname
> > > done
> >
> > I don't know about wsl, but could it be absorbing the standard input?
> > What if "wsl uname" is replaced with "wsl uname < /dev/null" ?
>
> You seem to be right; when I add < /dev/null as described, I get the 
> expected output.
Yes, indeed. Thanks.
Thomas
> Regards - Eliot
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple