This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 5/26/2016 10:55 AM, Tobias Zawada wrote:
Thanks, Ken for the following info:This looks like a bug I reported several years ago; it actually has nothing to do with emacs: https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/msg00445.html It was fixed but then reappeared some months later: https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00049.html It was fixed again but apparently is back. The test case from the original report still exhibits the problem.I had a look at the elisp-function gdb-send. The command process-send-string is used there for sending commands to gdb. Is it right that the problem manifests itself already there? The doc of process-send-string says that this command may send the string contents as separate bunches of data. If the output is already incomplete because of the partitioned input through process-send-string I see no way for a cygwin-specific workaround and we must wait for a fix of gdb.
I already wrote a test case (which was improved by cgf) in my original bug report. As you can see from reading that old thread, the problem *is* Cygwin specific and is provoked without partitioned input.
Do you know where I should report the bug?
This email thread is the right place to report the bug. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |