This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Query of type of memcpy (and sys_errlist) on Cygwin
- From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 at yahoo dot co dot jp>
- To: Marco Atzeri <marco dot atzeri at gmail dot com>, cygwin at cygwin dot com, Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker at t-online dot de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:27:31 +0900 (JST)
- Subject: Re: Query of type of memcpy (and sys_errlist) on Cygwin
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5707F2F0 dot 9050702 at gmail dot com> <5708CDB6 dot 1040500 at iki dot fi> <375427 dot 72225 dot qm at web101113 dot mail dot kks dot yahoo dot co dot jp> <5709FCDF dot 5010107 at gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <matsuoka at nuce dot nagoya-u dot ac dot jp>
> From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
> To: Marco Atzeri ; cygwin Hans-Bernhard Bröker
> Cc:
> Date: 2016/4/11, Mon 08:20
> Subject: Re: Query of type of memcpy (and sys_errlist) on Cygwin
>
>> From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
>> To: Marco Atzeri cygwin
>> Date: 2016/4/11, Mon 07:52
>> Subject: Re: Query of type of memcpy (and sys_errlist) on Cygwin
>>
>>> cygwin/newlib headers are under re-shuffle to simplify the guarding
>>> clauses in the main headers.
>>> It is possible that gnuplot is misleaded and don't correctly
> detect
>>> memcopy as it should.
>>>
>>> Have you tried to use latest test release ?
>>> https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2016-04/msg00012.html
>>>
>>
>> OK I will try and report results here.
> The results are almost the same as those at the stable release.
> The zipped config.log is placed here:
> http://www.geocities.jp/tmacchant2/config.log.20160411.zip
> The previous reply to Hans I made a mistake to extract the memcpy related part.
> I apologize for that.
> configure:9591: result: no
> configure:9591: checking for memcpy
> configure:9591: gcc -o conftest.exe -g -O2 -I/usr/local/include
> -L/usr/local/lib -lcerf conftest.c >&5
> conftest.c:86:6: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
> 'memcpy'
> char memcpy ();
>
> Seeing configure output screen: one can see that:
> checking for atexit... no
> checking for memcpy... no
> checking for memmove... no
> checking for memset... no
> checking for on_exit... no
> checking for bcopy... no
> checking for bzero... no
> checking for setvbuf... no
> checking for strerror... no
> checking for strchr... no
> checking for strrchr... no
> checking for strstr... no
> checking for index... no
> checking for rindex... no
> checking for erf... no
> checking for erfc... no
> checking for gamma... no
> checking for lgamma... no
> checking for getcwd... no
> checking for poll... no
> checking for pclose... no
> checking for popen... no
> checking for fdopen... no
> checking for select... no
> checking for sleep... no
> checking for stpcpy... no
> checking for strcspn... no
> checking for strdup... no
> checking for strndup... no
> checking for strnlen... no
> checking for strcasecmp... no
> checking for stricmp... no
> checking for strncasecmp... no
> checking for strnicmp... no
> checking for sysinfo... no
> checking for tcgetattr... no
> checking for vfprintf... no
> checking for doprnt... no
> checking for uname... no
> checking for usleep... no
> checking for snprintf... no
> WARNING: Could not find a working version of snprintf.
> If a user provides gnuplot with an improper format statement
> then a buffer overflow and/or segfault can result.
> Please consider providing snprintf via an external library.
> The above is very strange. Checks of many fucntions are no.
> Tatsuro
I have come back to the gcc 5.3.0-3 to 4.9.3-1.
However, the results are the same.
Tatsuro
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple