This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: 1.7.35: possible backspace key and arrow keys bug
- From: René Berber <r dot berber at computer dot org>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:44:40 -0500
- Subject: Re: 1.7.35: possible backspace key and arrow keys bug
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMOkCRZ4Tdg+UoydTj+ntXyyFvbhk8ug6A+LXAG3+zOw4UfuTw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150408221622 dot GK20741 at dinwoodie dot org> <CAF+j1MP-dtu66bq_kj5qQ7W7m7m64A1RvwW=Cga6-o1W2X5JUw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150409173434 dot GC6901 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <mg6hq4$gpo$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <20150410192151 dot GA13043 at phoenix>
On 4/10/2015 2:21 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-04-09, René Berber wrote:
>> Why vim on Cygwin doesn't install, or use if you add one, /etc/vimrc?
>
> Executing
> $ vim --version
> shows
> system vimrc file: "$VIM/vimrc"
> user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc"
> 2nd user vimrc file: "~/.vim/vimrc"
> user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc"
> fall-back for $VIM: "/etc"
> f-b for $VIMRUNTIME: "/usr/share/vim/vim74"
> From within vim,
> :echo $VIM
> shows
> /usr/share/vim
...
> So, Cygwin's vim looks for the system vimrc at /usr/share/vim/vimrc,
> not /etc/vimrc.
...
> Personally, I really like that Cygwin does not include a system
> vimrc in its vim package.
Two points:
1. Users expect things to work out-of-the-box. As shown by this thread
vim is not.
2. If there is a standard, it should be used. Moving from Linux to
Cygwin should be transparent, but in the former there is an /etc/vimrc,
in the later there isn't, and even more confusing: if you add one it
doesn't work (for the reason you showed).
...
> I don't understand what you mean that the 5th line doesn't work and
> has to be commented.
It means that if you leave it, vim will complain when you start it:
"Error detected while processing /etc/virc:
line 5:
E319: Sorry, the command is not available in this version: syntax on"
> I have "syntax on" in my ~/.vimrc file and
> syntax highlighting works just fine.
Corinna already pointed that out.
The point is: why does it work when in ~/.vimrc, and not on /etc/virc
(not a typo, /etc/vimrc is not used at all, another deviation from the
standard?).
Thanks for your reply, but this thread is getting off-topic.
--
René Berber
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple