This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Emacs-w32... Still Crashing
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:44:18 -0400
- Subject: Re: Emacs-w32... Still Crashing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1404760352 dot 3454 dot YahooMailNeo at web185401 dot mail dot gq1 dot yahoo dot com> <53BBF86B dot 7090801 at cornell dot edu> <20140708150247 dot GB2855 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <53BC1DF7 dot 1060701 at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:36:07AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>On 2014-07-08 10:02, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:55:55AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> Grasping at straws, as usual, I wonder if these mysterious crashes could
>>> be related to a bug that Corinna just fixed:
>>>
>>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2014-q3/msg00004.html
>>>
>>> Corinna, is this plausible? If so, maybe Gustav should try the next
>>> snapshot of the Cygwin DLL. (The current one doesn't seem to have this
>>> fix in it.)
>>
>> Actually, I was scratching my head over that change and wondering
>> what it was supposed to solve.
>
>We believe that this was the cause of e.g. mandb aborting on x86_64
>without manually enlarging the stack commit size:
"We"? Isn't that testable by setting the stack size down and putting a
printf in cygwin somewhere?
In any event, the comment in my code which is supposed to explain why
the tag is commented out is lacking details. If this patch is a joint
effort then please add more details to the change that you made to my
code.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple