This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries
- From: Jean-Pierre Flori <jpflori at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:26 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAHhGz8_eESbCpCWivD_G9ciFbE4VsZntZyRdOOOtd2PXUSsmgg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140402090750 dot GP2508 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <lhsctu$56e$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <20140407084312 dot GA2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <lhtqa1$ie3$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtsb6$ie3$2 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtve5$ie3$4 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtvgh$ie3$5 at ger dot gmane dot org>
Le Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:43:30 +0000, Jean-Pierre Flori a ÃcritÂ:
>>
>> Note in particular the __nm_ prefix.
>> It is as advertiserd here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/
>> msg00236.html But when looking at the Cygwin32 produced import lib, I
>> don't see any nm prefix.
>
> In fact, I see some... but for much fewer functions, strange.
I have troubles understanding when this _nm_ prefix actually gets added,
any help welcome :)
Is there any dark magic related to inlining?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple