This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: : Subversion packages
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:42:48 -0500
- Subject: Re: : Subversion packages
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFMYRRMFGxJhMKNKVgUEs45Lb5dLCf-5vq+Rp5s0H=Eg1yB5kw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFMYRRPZWqSJWZVVGDQLLZ55ZOcD_H9q7UgPr4iZyKw9vr2TbQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <932591092 dot 20131117224823 at mtu-net dot ru>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:48:23PM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>Greetings, Kevin Connor Arpe!
>>Subversion version series are important because local repositories
>>created by each series (1.6.x, 1.7.x, 1.8.x) are incompatible. In
>>short, if you do "svn checkout" with svn 1.6.x, you cannot do "svn
>>update" with svn 1.7.x or 1.8.x. For a variety of reasons, at my
>>office, I am forced to use svn 1.6.x series. This precludes me from
>>using standard pre-built Cygwin packages for Subversion work. I'm
>>always jumping back to a IDE or DOS box to manage my svn local repos.
>
>I'm using native Subversion client. 1.6, yes. For a simple fact I
>can't be arsed to launch svn tool each time I want to know, if I'm
>located in working directory or not.
>
>Do you have any hard reason to use Cygwin port?
Suggesting that someone not use Cygwin tools in the Cygwin mailing list
would seem to be rather obviously off-topic.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple