This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: INETUTILS and PING package missing from 64-bit Setup 2.830
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:37:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: INETUTILS and PING package missing from 64-bit Setup 2.830
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CE883C03C6B27343A6A342B05FDFA37265415E at BL2PRD0711MB433 dot namprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 10/23/2013 3:20 PM, Charles Butterfield wrote:
Also noticed that "inetutils" package is missing from 64-bit.
Also noticed that "ping" package is missing from 64-bit.
Gosh - I use both of these on occasion. I'm now feeling I may have made
a mistake in upgrading to 64-bit.
My questions:
1) Is there some way to install and run the 32-bit versions of the
packages that are missing from the 64-bit distro?
2) Are the missing packages "Just around the corner" 3) Should I just
pack it in, nuke my 64-bit setup and revert to 32-bits? I
had been hoping that the 64-bit version would fix some of the limitations of
running 32-bit shell and apps on a 64-bit Win8 platform (e.g. the System32
and SysWOW64 craziness, and confusing names), but the current Cygwin 64-bit
rough edges are making me uneasy. Am I missing something?
You have a couple of Cygwin-specific choices:
1. Install the 32-bit versions of the packages that you use and which
aren't available yet for the 64-bit version.
2. Just install the 32-bit version for now.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple