This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers]
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:07:56 -0500
- Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers]
- References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <50C881E7.6090600@etr-usa.com> <CAN4-eHL6w3Os0xojMycq8GGV46p02oMdchMgzV0qDBT6tptBGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN4-eHKheeP8Eb7uwBytbmC6f0UTr=sgDEmmP34V+_8tRqizEQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 1/7/2013 2:56 PM, Alan Thompson wrote:
Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month.
What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers? It does not seem
correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable.
Actually, it's a little less than a month. ;-) The maintainer responded
to it on December 12th.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple