This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: More on Cygwin package naming
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:46:49 -0400
- Subject: Re: More on Cygwin package naming
- References: <4E643ED8.3030100@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 9/4/2011 11:15 PM, Luke Kendall wrote:
It would be /nice/ if someone could confirm that the upstream project name
is used for the @-names, or at least that cygwin does not use any existing
Freshmeat project name and apply it to different software.
FWIW, I think it's fair to say that there is a convention of using the
upstream project name for the @-names. But as with all conventions, there
are variations used when called for. I think it's fair to say that the
last part of your statement is true but I also couldn't guarantee that it
will always be.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple