This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bash-4.2 and symlink to folder that turns to be not executable


On Aug  1 13:58, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have a bash-4.2 (installed in /home/my), compiled with GCC 4.6.1
> directly from the sources. With this one, the following script:
> 
> ---------------------------------
> #!/home/my/bash-4.2
> 
> rm -rf /tmp/xxx
> mkdir -p /tmp/xxx/folder1
> ln -s folder1 /tmp/xxx/folder
> if [ -d /tmp/xxx/folder ]; then echo folder; else echo no folder; fi
> if [ -x /tmp/xxx/folder ]; then echo execut; else echo no execut; fi
> exit
> ---------------------------------
> 
> produces:
> 
> folder
> no execut
> 
> while the regular /bin/bash (4.1.10), with the same script:
> 
> ---------------------------------
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> rm -rf /tmp/xxx
> mkdir -p /tmp/xxx/folder1
> ln -s folder1 /tmp/xxx/folder
> if [ -d /tmp/xxx/folder ]; then echo folder; else echo no folder; fi
> if [ -x /tmp/xxx/folder ]; then echo execut; else echo no execut; fi
> exit
> ---------------------------------
> 
> produces (correctly):
> 
> folder
> execut
> 
> 
> Could be a bug in bash-4.2, but...
> i have noticed that it occurs only under the newest snapshots.
> The change occurred between the 2011-07-21 and 2011-07-29 snapshots.
> 
> My current /proc/version | tr -d '@' is:
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 version 1.7.10s(0.249/5/3) (cgf) (gcc version 4.3.4 20090804 (release) 1 (GCC) ) 20110801 00:02:52
> 
> Could someone please have a look and reproduce this?

I can't since I have bash 4.1.10(4) from the distro installed.  This is
a nice case where you would have to debug this yourself since you have
the binaries available to do it.

However, at a first glance I doubt this is a Cygwin bug.  Consider:

- bash 4.1.10 returns "execut"
- /bin/test from coreustils returns "execut"
- My highly professional and streamlined testcase returns the correct
  result:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <errno.h>
    #include <string.h>

    void
    my_access (const char *file, int flag, const char *fname, int effective)
    {
      int ret = effective ? access (file, flag) : eaccess (file, flag);
      printf ("%saccess (%s, %s) = %d",
	      effective ? "e" : " ", file, fname, ret);
      if (ret)
	printf (" <%s>", strerror (errno));
      fputc ('\n', stdout);
    }

    int
    main (int argc, char**argv)
    {
      int eff;

      if (argc > 1)
	for (eff = 0; eff < 2; ++eff)
	  {
	    my_access (argv[1], F_OK, "F_OK", eff);
	    my_access (argv[1], R_OK, "R_OK", eff);
	    my_access (argv[1], W_OK, "W_OK", eff);
	    my_access (argv[1], X_OK, "X_OK", eff);
	  }
      return 0;
    }

  $ gcc -g -o access access.c
  $ ./access /tmp/xxx/folder
   access (/tmp/xxx/folder, F_OK) = 0
   access (/tmp/xxx/folder, R_OK) = 0
   access (/tmp/xxx/folder, W_OK) = 0
   access (/tmp/xxx/folder, X_OK) = 0
  eaccess (/tmp/xxx/folder, F_OK) = 0
  eaccess (/tmp/xxx/folder, R_OK) = 0
  eaccess (/tmp/xxx/folder, W_OK) = 0
  eaccess (/tmp/xxx/folder, X_OK) = 0


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]