This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
When I do an 'ls -al' (or a getfacl) on some files, I get: owner/group = ???????/???????, implying that the numeric uid/gid are not found in the passwd/group file.
This occurs even though I ran: mkpasswd -cl> /etc/passwd mkgroup --local> /etc/group
The /owner and /primary group are displayed in subinacl (often as 'trustedinstaller'). Note that 'trustedinstaller' doesn't appear in my passwd or group files.
So, question is why doesn't 'ls -al' and 'getfacl' give a more 'human readable' answer than '???????' even if trustedinstaller is a bogus name. Or should I just think of ?????? as cygwin for trustedinstaller?
trustedinstaller is new with Vista and is not really a user, which is why it doesn't show up in the passwd file. See this link for more details:
Your user != trustedinstaller. trustedinstaller is an indication that Windows wants to control the security of this file. It shouldn't be the owner of any files that are truly yours though.
-- Larry
Q: Are you sure?A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |