Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

[Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 24 10:31, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>>> Can I get a STC which shows the aforementioned problem?
>>   BTW, I don't see why this is anything other than a gcc testsuite problem; if
>> we want to use UTF-8 as the default encoding in the C locale, who's to say we
>> shouldn't?  I think it's just up to the testsuite to set the right flags for
>> the known target platform, isn't it?  The only thing I think we might benefit
>> from is a "US-ASCII" alias for CP437, perhaps.
> 
> Erm... *iff* we add US-ASCII encoding it should be an equivalent
> to "ASCII", shouldn't it?

  Don't ask me, I don't understand any of this stuff.  I mean, yes, probably
so, I just thought US-ASCII might be something different from ASCII and that
the difference might be that it implied the US code page.  I guess I should
have said 'a "US-ASCII" alias, standing for whatever it ought to stand for.'

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple