Re: dash vs. ash?

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Jul 10 10:37, Robert Klemme wrote:
> All,
> 
> I just notice that there is dash in cygwin 1.7 but there is also ash.
> What would be the reason to switch from ash to dash?  From what I am
> finding on the web it seems, dash was basically ash code modernized.
> So it seems when on 1.7 dash would be the preferred one.  Any insight?

I think dash is preferred in future.  In theory we should dash hardlink
to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely.  It's about time.  Eric?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple