This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Installation problems
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:39:51 -0400
- Subject: Re: Installation problems
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906151303510.25048@calypso.view.net.au>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 06/15/2009, Neanderthelle Jones wrote:
(1) Headers such as <bits/wordsize.h> should be there when gcc &
Co. are downloaded. I personally know that Cygwin is 32 bit. But the
program build needs to be able to find that out portably, not by a
Cygwin-specific hack. It compiles on Linux: why not on Cygwin?
<snip>
Looks like it's in 1.7, though you'll have to pull the source to get it.
<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/include/bits/?cvsroot=src>
If there is some reason they can't be provided,
If something is missing and you need it, then you're free to submit a
patch <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC>. This is an open-source project
after all.
if Cygwin is necessarily defective in that way, if it is necessary to buy
some Microsoft programming language compiler to get them, okay, but why was
I not told? Why is there nothing about it on the Cygwin site? Why do
I need to spend many hours discovering independently something that in
that case is well-known to cognoscenti?
Oh, sorry. Forget about my pointer to PTC. It's clear you feel cheated
and just want to moan about how this open-source project has wronged you.
In that case, the proper link is:
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM>
It's been withheld since there has been a sneaking suspicion for years
that you might need it and we didn't want to deprive you of this opportunity
to complain about it. But wait, that would make us nice and considerate.
Hm, I guess we can't win on this one...
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/