This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: tty dissociation


I don't intend on improving it. The referred to post is rather old and I wanted to verify if it is still valid or if any newer methods came to be since the last URL reference I gave you.

I assume from what you wrote that setsid() with no argumentss is still valid, correct?
Regards,
  darel henman

Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:48:52AM +0900, d.henman wrote:
> >Corinna in the following message, specified a way, ie.  use setsid(),
> >to dissociate a tty from a process.
> >
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00753.html
> >
> >I ust want to ask if this is still the preferred method, or if any
> >newer method exists?
> 
> Are you aware of a newer method available in linux?  How are you going
> to improve on a single simple call to a function with no arguments?
> 
> cgf
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]