This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:55:56 -0500
- Subject: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)
- References: <200512231711.jBNHBvBl016124@tigris.pounder.sol.net> <200512241816.jBOIGULc023975@tigris.pounder.sol.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0512241947350.1926@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> <200512261823.jBQINIYK012941@tigris.pounder.sol.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0512261557240.26685@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> <200512262231.jBQMVfiD014008@tigris.pounder.sol.net> <200512280538.jBS5clef022489@tigris.pounder.sol.net> <20051230062711.GA30157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
>>Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I
>>might try that would help you debug this?
>
>The latest snapshot has better strace capabilities. Rather than trying
>to munge your sshd service startup, please just start it as normal and,
>from a privileged account, use "strace -ostrace.out -pNNNN" to capture
>the output, where NNNN is the pid of the sshd process. You need to do
>this from an account which has enough privileges to both find the sshd
>process and to allow strace to access it. Either "ps -W" or taskman
>should show the pid of the running sshd.exe.
>
>Please use the latest DLL and the latest version of strace.exe from the
>snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Is there any movement on this? If multiple people can duplicate the problem
I would think that we'd have at least one person posting strace results.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/