This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Serious performance problems (new snapshot has some performance improvement)


On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:00:35PM -0400, Tacvek wrote:
>>Interesting, why is it faster when running a binary that doesn't depend
>>on cygwin1.dll after swapping the DLL?  Some Win caching mechanism?
>
>Repeating many times should minimize any caching:
>
>#New DLL
>$ /bin/time -f "%E %S %U" cygspd-mingw-ne-o7 cygspd.dat
>0:04.48 0.01 0.02
>0:01.40 0.00 0.02
>0:01.46 0.01 0.01
>0:01.39 0.01 0.01
>0:01.43 0.01 0.01
>#old DLL
>$ /bin/time -f "%E %S %U" cygspd-mingw-ne-o7 cygspd.dat
>0:01.45 0.01 0.01
>0:01.41 0.00 0.01
>0:01.40 0.01 0.01
>0:01.41 0.00 0.02
>0:01.41 0.00 0.02
>0:01.43 0.01 0.01
>
>
>Ok there is obviously some caching, which means that the original values I 
>gave inidacte that the improvement is somewhat less than they indicate. 
>They did not indicate very spectacular performance anyway. But fractional 
>seconds do not mean much.
>Based on some additioal experimentation, you should assume that the values 
>are acurate to +/- 1 second. 

There is no reason to expect any improvement in mingw programs from my
change.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]