Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.

[Andrew DeFaria <Andrew at DeFaria dot com>]

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Reed
> > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 12:51 PM
> > To: Gary R. Van Sickle
> > Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
> >
> > On 2005-01-08T17:57-0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > ) - The limericks in question are of interest only to 
> > junior-highschool-age
> > ) sysadmins and lawyers.
> >
> > I find them humorous.
>
> So are you a lawyer, or a junior-high-school-age sysadmin?

Isn't that your still unproven assertion? Stop engaging in strawmen.

> > ) - Redacting the limericks in question from Cygwin will eliminate 
> > the risk
> > ) they cause.
> >
> > You are not a lawyer,
>
> Says who?

Well you could easily clear that up. Are you a lawyer? Obviously not 
since by your very own assertion you are not interested in these 
limericks! (See what happens when you use silly arguments - you trip 
yourself up in them).

> > Please do not try to express a false legal opinion to justify a 
> > faulty personal one.
>
> I am expressing no legal opinion. I am merely stating the obvious: if 
> there's no potty-mouth there to offend, nobody can be offended by the 
> potty-mouth. Do you disagree with this axiom?

We have not established that either. Again it is your assertion.
--
Why do people ask "Can I ask you a question?".... Didn't really give me 
a choice there, did ya sunshine?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/