RE: Bogus assumption prevents d2u/u2d/conv/etal working on mixed files.

[Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>]

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, GARY VANSICKLE wrote:

> >  Noo... Please, remove all of these safety checks.
> > There must be some kind of user sanity presupposition. Or else the tools
> > soon will be crippled to a state where they are unusable for normal work.
>
> FWIW I'm with Hannu.  Should rm ask you, "Do you *really* want to delete
> this file?", or make a backup of every file you delete (ala the Recycle
> Bin)?  It should according to the thinking in this thread.

That's what the "-i" flag is for. :-)  But guess what?  It's not the
default!
IOW, I agree here.  The safety checks don't work (as I showed in
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-04/msg00116.html>), and they prevent a
legitimate use of the program.  If you really want to be safe, run "file"
before running "d2u/u2d".  Or, leave the safety checks in, but only if a
"--safe" (or whatever the appropriate name is) flag is given.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/