This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: CVS b0rked?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:18:16 -0000
- Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Ford [mailto:spamspamspam@eggchipsandspam]
> Sent: 15 January 2004 17:50
> To: Dave Korn
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
> Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body
> of messages.
> They are food for spam harvesters. I imagine this was just
> an oversight as I think I have seen you remove them before?
Oops, yes indeed. Sorry. It happened because I replied to the copy you
sent me directly instead of to the copy which came via the listserv with the
redacted headers. So I quoted an addy, but then again you've been Cc'ing
posters as well as sending to the list. Chalk us up one minor breach of
list etiquette each!
> > > [snip]
> > > > FAIL: pthread/cancel11.c (execute)
> > > >
> > > I don't see this one on NT4.
> > >
> > I repeated 'make check', and it repeated.
> There should be no reason to rebuild under a different Cygwin
> DLL version.
Agreed, unless by some terrible coincidence there's a bug in the snapshot
version that impacts on the compiler in some subtle way. However that's a
pretty unlikely possibility I agree.
> However, if you did not do a clean build as I suggested after
> CGF fixed the CVS tree, I would again recommend it.
Yeh, I just completely rm my obj and install dirs every time.
> You could try to debug it :).
Ya never know, I might just do that. Is it worth rebuilding with
--enable-debugging at configure time ? I dunno how much worthwhile that
will actually give me....
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/