This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
Alex wrote:
> "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb@nyckelpiga.de> wrote in message
> 157-1772867639.20031030154714@familiehaase.de">news:157-1772867639.20031030154714@familiehaase.de...
>> Alex wrote:
>>
>> > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers
>> >
>> >
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de
>> > was used as a performance testsuite
>> > to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers.
>>
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > | Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3
>> >
>> |------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> > | Version 8.35n | - | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 | 3.82 : 3.74 |
>> >
>> |========================================================================|
>>
>>
>> Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would
>> increase perfomance?
>>
> [snip]
> What is the way to test that?
> In other words, is there STLporting with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler?
I posted a Makefile to build a Cygwin version of STLport with DLL's and
static archives: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg00790.html
If it shows up that using STLport instead of libstdc++ templates
increases the speed of the code running, maybe someone volunteers to
maintain an STLport package for Cygwin?
Gerrit
--
=^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/