This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: objdump : inaccurate demangling for foo(char* const)


"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn@connect.to> wrote in message bkdtn1$597$2@sea.gmane.org">news:bkdtn1$597$2@sea.gmane.org...
> ==========================================
> Windows 2000 Professional
> CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.4(0.94/3/2)
> GNU gcc version 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
> GNU objdump 2.14.90 20030901
> ==========================================
>

Updated question about objdump.

Low-level and user-level symbol names of foo2(char* const) are foo2(char*)

--------- C++ code ---------
void foo1 (char*) {}
void foo2 (char* const) {}
----------------------------


--------- objdump : Fragments ---------
$ objdump -Cd t.o

t.o:     file format pe-i386

Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <__Z4foo1Pc>:    // OK

00000006 <__Z4foo2Pc>:    // char*, not char* const


$ objdump -d t.o

t.o:     file format pe-i386

Disassembly of section .text:

00000000 <foo1(char*)>:    // OK


00000006 <foo2(char*)>:    // Not char* const

--------------------------------------

So, is it inaccuracy or convention?


   =====================================
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn@connect.to
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
   =====================================




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]