This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:47:39PM -0500, Paul Swartz wrote: > On 20 Feb 2003 at 22:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > As you can see, there's also nothing which would help you in using the > > result to identify the sockets as being the same. Even the timestamps > > aren't identical. > > No one field can say it's the same file. All of them together, or a > sufficiently large number of them, does. Nope. How should they? The really interesting fields are not identical as e. g. st_dev, st_ino, st_mode, st_ctime. Anyway, that's not a Cygwin issue anymore. > Even if it isn't completely portable, at the very least, things like the > uid/gid definatly shouldn't change. The ctime/mtime probably shouldn't > either, I'm less sure about atime. I don't have a copy of POSIX, does that > say anything about the stat/fstat semantics? SUSv3: http://www.opengroup.org/ Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin at cygwin dot com Red Hat, Inc.
Attachment:
sock-stat.c
Description: Text document
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |