binutils 20021107-2

[Charles Wilson]

Christopher Faylor wrote:


>>>Nope.  Chris should apply the attached patch to binutils and re-release. 
>>>It's surprising we didn't catch this when gcc-3.x/gcc2-2.95 were 
>>>getting their shakedown this summer.  Oh well.
>>>
>>>Also, Chris, you could take the opportunity of binutils-20021107-3 to 
>>>apply Egor's remaining patches...  :-)
>>>
>>
>>Oops.  Previous patch still left a chunk of Egor's changes.  New patch 
>>replaces.
>>
> 
> How about submitting the patch to the binutils mailing list?
> 


I've no objections -- but the patch is a workaround for a 
cygwin-specific packaging decision (e.g. providing gcc-2.95.3 as "gcc-2" 
and renaming the runtime libs accordingly).

Is that something that should go into the "real" binutils CVS, or should 
it be kept in the cygwin binutils package only?

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/