This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: binutils 20021107-2


Charles Wilson wrote:


Oops. Previous patch still left a chunk of Egor's changes. New patch replaces.

How about submitting the patch to the binutils mailing list?


I've no objections -- but the patch is a workaround for a cygwin-specific packaging decision (e.g. providing gcc-2.95.3 as "gcc-2" and renaming the runtime libs accordingly).

Is that something that should go into the "real" binutils CVS, or should it be kept in the cygwin binutils package only?
Another alternative -- slightly more general (don't include the "." char, and take advantage of the fact that we only check the first N characters of the name).

--Chuck
Index: pe-dll.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/pe-dll.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.45 pe-dll.c
--- pe-dll.c	6 Nov 2002 19:36:20 -0000	1.45
+++ pe-dll.c	9 Nov 2002 18:28:56 -0000
@@ -228,12 +229,12 @@
 /* Do not specify library suffix explicitly, to allow for dllized versions.  */
 static autofilter_entry_type autofilter_liblist[] =
 {
-  { "libgcc.", 7 },
-  { "libstdc++.", 10 },
-  { "libmingw32.", 11 },
-  { "libg2c.", 7 },
-  { "libsupc++.", 10 },
-  { "libobjc.", 8 },
+  { "libgcc", 6 },
+  { "libstdc++", 9 },
+  { "libmingw32", 10 },
+  { "libg2c", 6 },
+  { "libsupc++", 9 },
+  { "libobjc", 7 },
   { NULL, 0 }
 };
 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]