This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.
- From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>,"Jens Yllman" <jens at yllman dot com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:03:57 -0000
- Subject: Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.
- References: <5.1.1.6.0.20021104214628.01f89700@pop3.yllman.com>
Jens Yllman <jens@yllman.com> wrote:
> But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for
> granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they
> seem to be functions.
So? Dropping your unnecessary :: is not "taking for granted that they always
are defines".
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/