This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: errno reset when using thread enabled gcc


On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:09:26 -0400 (EDT)
Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Anurag Sharma wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have come across a strange behaviour using native gcc on cygwin. I
> > understand that this issue is not 100% relevant to this list, but I am
> > hoping some one might have come across this issue before. Apologies
> > for any incovinience. I have posted the same on newlib mailing list
> > too.
> >
> > Consider this short code:
> >
> >    int fd = ::open("/tmp/errnotest", O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);
> >
> >     if (fd == -1) {
> >         std::cerr << "open failed, errno=" << errno << ", strerror="
> >         << strerror(errno) << std::endl; std::cerr << "open failed,
> >         errno=" << errno << ", strerror=" << strerror(errno) <<
> >         std::endl;
> >     }
> >
> > If I build the gcc compiler by providing --enable-threads=single
> > option in the configure stage, following is the output :
> >
> > open failed, errno=2, strerror=No such file or directory
> > open failed, errno=2, strerror=No such file or directory
> >
> > This is of course expected.
> >
> > Hoewever if I build the compiler by providing --enable-threads=posix
> > option in the configure stage, the output is as follows :
> >
> > open failed, errno=2, strerror=No such file or directory
> > open failed, errno=0, strerror=No error
> >
> > That is , after the first call to errno, it is reset!!
> >
> > Has anyone else experiened this before? Can anyone please help find
> > out what exactly is going wrong?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anurag
> 
> Anurag,
> 
> While I don't know for sure that this is what's happening, have you
> considered that operator<< or endl may (re)set errno?
> 	Igor

Yes Igor,

It is the STL iostream operators which are resetting it. Using the
threading model of posix does make the STL thread safe, but why should it
affect errno? 

Thanks for your response.

Reagrds,
Anurag

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]