This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: missing file FOO.dll
- From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms at yahoo dot com>
- To: Charles Wilson <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: missing file FOO.dll
> No, there was a strange bug in our original packaging of some libraries
> -- libpng, ncurses, etc. -- which has since been fixed, but some
> packages still depend on the "pre split" packages. Once those are
> flushed frpm the pipeline, all will be well, except for unofficial
> programs like XEmacs.
>
> --Chuck
Chuck & Friends,
Is there a fundemental reason (now) why the xemacs people refuse to merge
their cygwin packages into the official cygwin tree? Seems like this
would be a nice package to have, espcially now that cygwin-xfree has been
merged. Is xemacs one of those packages that could be setup to act like
rxvt, where there is cygwin-console, mingw, and X11 functionality? I
recall you mentioning it as an example in your HFS thread awhile back. If
so I think this package would definitely benifit many in the emacs camp
(unfortunately I am "vi" person myself ;P). Considering the xemacs ppl
aren't on the same page, maybe it is about time we get them on the same
page. I'm sure all that is required is a few friendly inquiries from the
cygwin maintainers... These are just my opinions, and I'm not try to brew
up any trouble, but please feel free to disagree...
Cheers,
Nicholas
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/