This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygreadline5.dll redux
- From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Cc: jhg at athensgroup dot com
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:36:05 -0500
- Subject: Re: cygreadline5.dll redux
- References: <3C728A63.1040107@athensgroup.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:24:51AM -0600, James Garrison wrote:
>This file appears to be missing.
>
>Before someone jumps on my case and says "Search the archives"
>I'd like to point out that
>
>a) The archives are highly polluted with messages containing
> cygcheck output that lists cygreadline5.dll. A search for
> just "cygreadline5.dll" returns hundreds of hits most of which
> have nothing to do with the problem.
>
>b) The archive search engine is too stupid to understand
> quoted strings meaning adjacency, so that searching for
> 'cygrealine5.dll "not found"' is equivalent to searching
> for the individual words. Since 'found' appears in cygcheck
> output, this does not reduce the number of hits at all.
>
>Could someone please either answer the question as to why
>some packages still require this library even though it does
>not appear to be included in the distribution, and then
>add the answer to the FAQ?
Hmm. A mailing list search of the stupid search engine with
"cygreadline5.dll not found" unearthed this within a few clicks:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/msg01619.html
If this doesn't answer the question, then I don't know what the
question is.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/