This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: few more questions
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- Cc: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:48:18 +1100
- Subject: Re: few more questions
- References: <00b001c17081$fd7ffc80$10870518@rdondo1.ca.home.com> <3BF83C82.5010109@ece.gatech.edu> <20011119001720.GA20633@redhat.com> <003b01c17090$c521c210$578208d2@itdomain.net.au> <3BF88E1C.80103@ece.gatech.edu>
Just cleaning up my mailbox, found this unansewered...
I took the single question pre mail as a corollary to
"Use meaningful, specific subject headers". If you have two questions(*)
then a meaningful specific subject header becomes much less likely.
(*) Questions in the sense of a group of tightly bound statements and
requests, not in the sense of a single sentence with a '?' tacked on the
end.
Rob
===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: few more questions
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > IIRC it is in the ESR document. Hmm.
>
>
> Well, he says hackers don't like open-ended time sinks. He also says
> subject lines should be descriptive. But I *don't* see where he says
that
> a single message should not contain multiple questions. Wanna give me
the
> section reference where he says that?
>
> --Chuck
>
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/