This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: -mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
- From: Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>
- To: David Abrahams <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Cc: David Abrahams <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 06:34:15 +1100 (EST)
- Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
--- David Abrahams <david.abrahams@rcn.com> wrote: > ------
> Request: If you can remember to, please reply to me personally in
> addition
> to sending your reply to the cygwin list. Thanks!
> ------
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use -mno-cygwin with a Cygwin GCC-3.0.2 that I built from
> sources. It seems that there are some preprocessor symbol definitions
> missing, for example:
>
> _U=01 _L=02 _N=04 _S=010 _P=020 _C=040 _X=0100 _B=0200 // for ctype_base
> _GLIBCPP_HAVE_MBSTATE_T
>
> it gets the wrong definition of
> _GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSF
> et. al. from std_cmath.
>
> Is there a way to make this work?
> It seems to me that the MINGW community (and Cygwin for that matter) is
> pretty committed to gcc-2.95.x, but I want the improved C++ compiler
> available with 3.0.2. Is anyone out there doing a similar thing, or am I
> completely out on a limb?
>
Speaking as a mingw developer, I am committed to a GCC 3.1 for mingw in
April 2001.
> TIA,
> Dave
>
http://shopping.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Shopping
- Free CDs for thousands of Priority Shoppers!
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/