This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Process ID table may be screwed up
- To: "Smith, Stephen P (AZ75)" <smith_stephen at htc dot honeywell dot com>, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: RE: Process ID table may be screwed up
- From: "Smith, Stephen P (AZ75)" <smith_stephen at htc dot honeywell dot com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:19:08 -0500
Well doing some research, I find that Win32 error is "The handle is invalid.
ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE"
Chris, The error is being generated in the sigproc.cc file at line 266. Is
this a critical error?
sps
-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Stephen P (AZ75) [mailto:smith_stephen@htc.honeywell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:24 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Process ID table may be screwed up
I went back to an earlier version of cygwin and an earlier version that was
compiled with that cygwin and and was able to build my code.
I then upgraded my cygwin leaving my source code at the labled version and
tried rebuilding. In this case my PID error moved.
Here is an example of the error:
0 [main] sh 1900 proc_subproc: Couldn't duplicate my handle<0x34> for
pid 1636, Win32 error 6
How do I fix this. I am wondering if the table is running out of space.
The earlier version of cygwin (1.1.8-2).
The current version of cygwin ( version 1.3.3.-2)
sps
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/