Re: GDB breaks in 1.3.3-2 on certain Win2000 machines -- something to try

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:03:18AM +0100, Bill Petheram wrote:
>gdb doesn't work for me on Win2k. I am building a debug verion of gdb 
>and 1.3.3-2. I hope to have more info late.

You are responding to a message where I indicated that I added some
extra debugging to the CVS/snapshot version of cygwin.  I didn't
retroactively add it to 1.3.3.

Why are you responding to a message indicating that there is an updated
version to try with the announcement that you are going to try the old
version?

cgf

>'cgf@redhat.com' wrote:
>>Just in case this got lost in my previous long-winded email, it would be
>>helpful if people could try the latest cygwin snapshot and report if the
>>problem has changed.
>>
>>It would be even more helpful if people could build a debugging version
>>of cygwin and report on the gdb stack trace, if it still fails.  I
>>suspect that it *will* still fail as I didn't really do anything
>>substantial that would have fixed the problem.
>>
>>However, the stack trace should now be slightly more informative.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/