This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: binutils is no longer experimental

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:

> >> >Thanks for your answer. Could you please answer one more: why binutils
> >> >provided by Cygwin distribution is so different from the ordinal one?
> >> >Is it planned to do a merge?
> >> 
> >> ???  It is not "so different".  There is one minor change (below) in ld.
> >> 
> >> Otherwise it is straight from binutils CVS.
> >
> >Well, this command line
> >
> >diff -ur binutils-20010802-1\binutils binutils-2.11.2\binutils >binutils.diff
> >
> >gives a 328292 bytes diff. It is without comparison of other subdirectories.
> >
> >Am I doing something wrong?
> 
> "CVS"

Do you mean that binutils-20010802-1 and binutils-2.11.2 were made not from CVS?

Btw the result of diffing binutils-20010425-2 and binutils-2.11.2 is much more
different.
--
Dmitry.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]