This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: execve() fails in a thread under 98/ME
Yes, I understand. I can't help but contribute our developer's
analysis of your analysis :-)
(Patient): "Doctor! It hurts when I do this!"
(Doctor): "Well then don't do that!"
Someday maybe 9x will disappear; I shudder, though, when I think
what it might be replaced by.
We have decided, btw, that it is far easier to kludge our own code
rather than yours.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If PAGE_GUARD is not implemented for Windows 9x, then the "solution"
> will be "don't do that on Windows 9x". I'll add a guard against this in
> fork when I return from vacation. I'll have the fork fail with a ENOSYS
> or something.
> As the author of the original code, I'm not interested in trying to
> kludge around this for Windows 9x. It was hard enough to get right in
> its current form. However, I'll certainly, as always, accept patches.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html