Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tuesday 19 December 2000 03:42, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
>> >To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>> >
>> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sounds reasonable to me.  CYGWIN=smbfakeperm ?  CYGWIN=nodomain ?
>> >
>> >CYGWIN=SMBisBroken ?
>>
>> CYGWIN=ilikepie ?
>>
>> Nah.  Too much of a possibility of misinterpretation.
>
>I know, this is somewhat dry but I have decided to use [no]smbntsec.
>
>What I'm curious about is what do you think should be the default?
>Personally I would prefer to have smbntsec off by default but to
>have it on by default would match the current behaviour.
>
>Opinions?

Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting?
In fact, maybe a

mount -n c:\foo /foo	# use NTSEC semantics

would be sort of nice.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple