This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?

To: gnuwin32 <cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:20:23 -0400
References: <03F4742D8225D21191EF00805FE62B9904B3F579@aa-msg-01.medstat.com> <39EE1D6A.82DEE226@dddandr.octacon.co.uk> <39F002C6.3F331AA8@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>
Reply-To: cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com

On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:31:02AM +0100, Don Sharp wrote:
>Following up on Larry Hall's suggestion to try a new snapshot I
>downloaded cygwin-inst-20001018.tar.bz2 but the resulting dll makes bash
>exit immediately with a handle complaint. Can anyone recommend a
>relatively stable recent snapshot?

Yep.  20001018 was broken.

20001019 should be better.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

References:
- RE: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
  - From: John Wiersba
- Re: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
  - From: Don Sharp
- Re: Why does ls report some directory dates as future?
  - From: Don Sharp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]