This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: _argc & _argv
- To: cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: _argc & _argv
- From: "Paul Garceau" <pgarceau at teleport dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:21:36 -0800
- Organization: New Dawn Productions
- References: <39870B67.4472.10CC499@localhost>; from pgarceau@teleport.com on Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:39:51PM -0800
- Reply-to: Paul Garceau <pgarceau at teleport dot com>
On 1 Aug 2000, at 20:46, the Illustrious Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:39:51PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote: >Hi
> folks, > > From what I can tell, the values noted in the
> subject line >are not defined as part of standard non-mingw32
> headers. > > My question is, how does Cygwin deal with argc,
> argv without >using mingw32 headers?
>
> Like any UNIX program (or Windows program for that matter). They
> are arguments to main:
Yes, I know that...I also realize that these sound like foolish
questions that only a newbie would ask...when working with three
or four different compiler ports at any given time, they tend to
get mixed up...
>
> int main (int argc, char **argv);
More specifically, is argc, argv defined with or w/o leading
underscores for Cygwin when it comes to defining them for a
main() routine?
csMain (argc, argv); (Cygwin?)
csMain (__argc, __argv); (Mingw/MS)
csMain(_argc,_argv); (Borland)
Thanks,
Paul G.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
>
Nothing real can be threatened.
Nothing unreal exists.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com