This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: We can get down to 30us resolution!
- To: "Wong, Homer" <Homer dot Wong at team dot telstra dot com>
- Subject: Re: We can get down to 30us resolution!
- From: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:57:43 +0200
- CC: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <5F4D0B436B7FD311B00C0008C724ADA6018C0AB1@ntmsg0009.corpmail.telstra.com.au>
- Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
Hello Homer,
Wong, Homer <Homer.Wong@team.telstra.com> wrote:
WH> Hi
WH> Thanks to Tim, I have found the solution. On Windows NT and Windows 95 we
WH> can use QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceFrequency. Although it
WH> is non-portable, it IS a way of getting better resolution time performance
WH> on a Windows PC.
For me, QueryPerformanceFrequency() on 95 gives very low
frequency, far from any satisfactory. I want being able to count up to
400MHz on my PII-400 ;-) If that's what you want, you can look at
http://www.is.lg.ua/~paul/devel/perf-count.html . Extra feature that
it's not tied to any some windows and works on any Intel (i586+)
system (tested on win32 & Linux). By the way, is this ontopic?
--
Paul Sokolovsky, IT Specialist
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=11135
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com