This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re[4]: ld or gcc failing?
- To: Mumit Khan <khan at nanotech dot wisc dot EDU>
- Subject: Re[4]: ld or gcc failing?
- From: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:30:04 +0300
- CC: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <199909271916.OAA11513@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
- Reply-To: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml at is dot lg dot ua>
Hello Mumit,
Mumit Khan <khan@nanotech.wisc.EDU> wrote:
[]
MK> Ah, the joys of "interesting" comdat issues in the current binutils.
MK> There's work on going, so please have patience. I'm sure Ian is still
MK> chugging through the large set of patches from Donn Terry ...
>> So, I would like to ask is this a bug in pe/coff handling or ld
>> just cannot catch up with g++ ?
MK> The issue is really comdat handling more than having to catch up to
MK> g++. Once comdats are handled correctly, g++ support will implicitly
MK> work.
MK> What binutils snapshot did you try these with?
Still with locally hacked versions of binutils from b20.1. Just
waiting when dll-DATA patches make their way to CVS to not reapply
them again ;-)
MK> Regards,
MK> Mumit
Best regards,
Paul mailto:paul-ml@is.lg.ua
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com