This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
Re: egcs vs gcc
- To: Aldo Mazzilli <aldo.mazzilli@inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: egcs vs gcc
- From: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:01:28 -0500 (CDT)
- cc: gnu-win32@cygnus.com
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Aldo Mazzilli wrote:
>
> I have to build 2 cross-compilers to Win32 :
> - i386-pc-cygwin32
> - i386-pc-mingw32.
>
> And, I have to choose the compiler between EGCS and GCC.
> I just want your advice concerning the best choose I can do between EGCS
> and GCC.
>
> My choose must depend on :
> - reexamination degree of the compiler
> - security degree of the compiler
Don't know what either of the above mean, sorry.
> - efficiency of produced code
> - size of produced code
Cygwin code is always going to be a bit less efficient that Mingw code
simply because of the emulation layer. Whether it's acceptable or not
depends on what your application does! For floating point intensive code,
Cygwin's math library provided by newlib is not that great, and you'll
get faster results (and fewer bugs) with MS runtime.
> Is there any benchmarks concerning this study.
> if not, which benchmark C suite can I use to build Benchmarks Charts.
Try your own application. That's usually always the best benchmark.
My suggestion: don't start out by choosing one over the other; try both
and then decide.
What does this have to do with crossgcc?? I'm removing it from the list
of recipients.
Regards,
Mumit
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
- References:
- egcs vs gcc
- From: Aldo Mazzilli <aldo.mazzilli@inria.fr>