Re: Cygwin32 Signals

[cgf at bbc dot com (Chris Faylor)]

In article <01BCCA67.FB0348F0@gater.krystalbank.msk.ru>,
Sergey Okhapkin  <sos@prospect.com.ru> wrote:
>Trevor Yann wrote:
>> The current signal handling code processes signals in the user's thread.
>> If signals were processed in a separate thread I don't think that
>> Windows95 would have a problem:
>>
>> 1.	suspend user thread (don't care whether or not it is doing
>> 	system stuff)
>> 2.	invoke signal handling
>> 3.	resume user thread
>>
>> Unfortunately there is software that assumes that signals are processed
>> in the user's context - functions like longjmp will only work if signals
>> are processed in the user's thread.
>
>It's the cause of executing signal handler in main thread. Hopefully Chris 
>Faylor solved most of Win95-specific problems. His patch is now in 
>testing/fixing stage.

Actually, right now, it's in the testing/scratching-head-perplexedly phase.
-- 
http://www.bbc.com/	cgf@bbc.com			"Strange how unreal
VMS=>UNIX Solutions	Boston Business Computing	 the real can be."
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".