This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: compile error - gcc or cygwin ?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'don't mention the captain's log'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:06:10 +0100
- Subject: RE: compile error - gcc or cygwin ?
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
----Original Message----
>From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
>Sent: 11 April 2005 00:37
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:39:11PM -0700, bill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After the last cygwin update (1005.14.0.0),
>
> Is that a stardate? Probably not, the Stardate calculator
> http://www.route56.com/startrek/stardate.html says that's
> Fri, 03 Aug 2266 09:42:00 GMT
From the source:
---------------------<snip!>---------------------
// TOS- SD 0 = January 6, 2266
// 1 SDU = 18000 s (4.8 SDU = 1 day)
TOS = Date.UTC(2266, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0);
// Star Trek I intermediate - SD 7320 = March 11, 2270
// 1 SDU = 600000 s (0.144 SDU = 1 day)
STI = Date.UTC(2270, 2, 11, 0, 0, 0);
// Movies II-VI - SD 8076.0 = 25 July 2284
// 1 SDU = 180000 s (0.48 SDU = 1 day)
CFS = Date.UTC(2284, 6, 25, 0, 0, 0);
// TNG - SD 18561.6 = April 18, 2340
// 1 SDU = 31500 s (1001 SDU ~ 1 year)
TNG = Date.UTC(2340, 3, 18, 0, 0, 0);
---------------------<snip!>---------------------
Blimey. I know there's relativity to take into account and all that, but
even so, the stardate seems to be a fairly elasticy concept of time. Anyone
who didn't know it was all real might think they had just been making up
numbers at the start of each episode with little regard for internal
consistency!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....