This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sep 1 13:05, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On 08/31/2016 09:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > On Aug 31 20:07, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > >> Instead of find_exec, without changing behaviour use new pathfinder > >> class with new allocator_interface around tmp_pathbuf and new vstrlist > >> class. > >> * pathfinder.h (pathfinder): New file. > >> * vstrlist.h (allocator_interface, allocated_type, vstrlist): New file. > >> * dlfcn.cc (dlopen): Avoid redundant GetModuleHandleExW with RTLD_NOLOAD > >> and RTLD_NODELETE. Switch to new pathfinder class, using > >> (tmp_pathbuf_allocator): New class. > >> (get_full_path_of_dll): Drop. > >> [...] > > > > Just one nit here: > > > >> +/* Dumb allocator using memory from tmp_pathbuf.w_get (). > >> + > >> + Does not reuse free'd memory areas. Instead, memory > >> + is released when the tmp_pathbuf goes out of scope. > >> + > >> + ATTENTION: Requesting memory from an instance of tmp_pathbuf breaks > >> + when another instance on a newer stack frame has provided memory. */ > >> +class tmp_pathbuf_allocator > >> + : public allocator_interface > > > > You didn't reply to > > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2016-08/msg00013.html > > So, again, why didn't you simply integrate a tmp_pathbuf member into the > > pathfinder class, rather than having to create some additional allocator > > class? I'm probably not the most diligent C++ hacker, but to me this > > additional allocator is a bit confusing. > > Sorry, seems I've failed to fully grasp your concerns firsthand in > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2016-08/msg00016.html > Second try to answer: > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2016-09/msg00000.html Ok, I see what you mean, but it doesn't make me really happy. I'm willing to take it for now but I'd rather see basenames being a member of pathfinder right from the start, so you just instantiate finder and call methods on it. Given that basenames is a member, you can do the allocator stuff completely inside the pathfinder class. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |