Re: [PATCH] suggestion for faster pseudo-reloc.

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Sep  3 19:02, JonY wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Sep  3 17:34, JonY wrote:
> >> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
> >>>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
> >>>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in
> >>> sync, there has been some effort in ensuring that the pseudo-reloc
> >>> implementation used by all three remains very similar if not identical.
> >>>
> >>> Please bring this patch to the attention of the mingw.org and
> >>> mingw64.sf.net people, if it's not too much trouble.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Chuck
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Original message already forwarded to mingw-w64 devel list. Thanks
> >> Jin-woo Ye.
> > 
> > Do you want the patch I eventually applied, too?
> > 
> > 
> > Corinna
> > 
> 
> Yeah, that will be good too.
> 
> I forwarded the CVS commit message too.

It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate
to send a follow up mail to the mingw-w64 devel with the attached
patch.

> I'm not sure if anybody else is
> more suited to comment on it than Kai, he is still on vacation though.

No worries.  I'm on vacation myself.  If my slipped disc hadn't kept me
home, I would be in England now :|


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: pseudo-reloc.diff
Description: Text document