Re: [patch] Update build flags for new compiler feature

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>]

On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Since I have a running gcc-4.34 now, do you still want me to do that?
>>Please keep in mind that I'm a lazy cow...
>
>Efficient use of resources != laziness.  No, I wouldn't suggest doing
>that, what you ended up with by hacking the header files should (in
>theory, anyway) be the same as what you would get if the autoconf tests
>had done it for you.
>
>Now that all the related mysteries are solved, I'll go ahead and commit
>that patch to the build flags.  (I just thought it would be kind of
>wrong of me to leave HEAD in a state where the one and only actual
>RedHat staffer working on the project couldn't compile it!)

FWIW, I have a running cross-compiled version of 4.34 too.  And I also
updated my binutils while I was at it.

The latest snapshot has been built with that combination.

Thanks for all of your hard gcc work, Dave.

cgf