This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: --enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc support in cygwin, take 3.
Charles Wilson wrote:
I've tested Egor's patch and it seems to work just fine, as demonstrated
by the two test cases he posted last week, AND as demonstrated by the
test case posted to the binutils list some months ago (it tested
pseudo-reloc behavior in the child after a fork).
I've also tested Egor's runtime reloc support with Ralf's binutils "use
the DLL as the import lib" and it ALSO works fine in all three cases.
I'm going to continue using ld.exe-ralf and
cygwin1.dll-egor/libcygwin.a-egor for my day-to-day use, just to see if
something wacky crops up...
[snip]
On balance, I agree that #1 is the best option. Unless I run afoul of
some unforseen wackiness in the next few days, recommend inclusion as is
(in the most recent iteration, e.g. no cygwin.sc changes)
So far, no problems. I'm gonna go on record in favor of this patch, in
its 4th incarnation
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00222.html).
given that winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c(*) still retains its BSD licensing
and comments, there's no reason to change the (non-)license/public
domain attribution in egor's pseudo-relocs.c file. Egor's patch #4
should be able to be committed as-is.
--Chuck
(*) winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c still retains the original
BSD-with-advert license which is explicitly incompatible with the GPL.
And since it is the NetBSD variant, it doesn't fall under the
"rescinded" announcement made by the Berkeley folks:
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
(the NetBSD folks are quite clear that they LIKE the advertisement
clause in their license)
However, the FreeBSD folks DO abide by the "rescind clause 3" decision;
perhaps we should replace our (modified) getopt.c with a similarly
modified one from FreeBSD?