This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [PATCH] Move per_thread::set() def from fork.cc to perthread.h


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:cygwin-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Christopher
> Faylor
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:25 PM
> To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move per_thread::set() def from fork.cc to
> perthread.h
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 08:13:24PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >>>Ah, good point.  Do you have any objections then to a perthread.cc?
> >>
> >>I guess not in principle but it seems kind of pointless for one
> >>function.
> >
> >It would be, so what I did was move much of the implementation of
> >per_thread, per_thread_waitq, per_thread_vfork, and
> >per_thread_signal_dispatch into it (just the virtuals right now).
> 
> If you mean that you've moved the inline methods into the source file
> then I don't want to do that.
>

No, just the virtuals.  Like Robert said, I don't believe they inline.
 
> >>  And, it would be enough of a patch that I'd need an
> >> assignment from you.  I don't think we have an assignment on file from
> >> you, do we?
> >
> >No, do you want to fax me one?
> 
> It works the other way around.  You snail mail me one:
> http://cygwin.com/contrib.html
> 

Ok, thanks, I'll take a look.

> cgf
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]