This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
- To: cygwin-developers at sources dot redhat dot com, cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:40:04 -0400
- References: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20010621222615.C13746@redhat.com> <3B3324A7.49FFC98A@yahoo.com> <054c01c0fbef$5f600e20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <06a001c0fc51$7a87e210$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
- Reply-To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:00:43PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
>
>
>>
>> I've attached my current sandbox changes. The code _is not finished_.
>(I
>> am _looking_ at adding the prev/curr/exp capability to whole
>categories
>> as well as the code cleanliness I mention below).
>>
>
>Still not 100%, but much cleaner and easier to read:
>
>Known bugs:
>1) The partial view when you enter the package list has a scroll bar one
>line too many long.
>2) The category view always shows _all_ packages. There's no
>category-partial view. Do we need one?
I just played with this and I like what I see.
I had a hard time getting all of the changes into the current CVS, though,
and the view was sort of screwed up.
Robert, if you are still interested, then I think that this is definitely the
way to go. If you have something worth checking in, then please do so.
One thing I noticed is that the Category view is not the default and I think
it should be. Or, maybe that was just a botched patch.
Thanks,
cgf